Why is 'Victory by Definition' a problematic rhetorical strategy?

'Victory by Definition' is considered a problematic rhetorical strategy primarily because it relies on definitional arguments to win by exclusion. This approach allows an individual or group to define terms in narrow or selective ways that favor their position while excluding counterarguments. By manipulating the definition, they create a framework within which their argument appears overwhelmingly strong, effectively dismissing alternative viewpoints without engaging with them substantively.

This strategy can lead to an unproductive debate, as the focus shifts from the actual merits of the arguments being presented to the semantics of the definitions themselves. Consequently, it stifles meaningful discussion and critical analysis, as opponents might find themselves trapped by the terms set forth by the definitional argument, limiting their capacity to counter the claims effectively.

In essence, while it may seem advantageous to utilize definitions in this manner, it can undermine the integrity and depth of discourse by prioritizing rhetorical maneuvering over genuine engagement with the ideas at stake.