Which type of logical fallacy seeks to distract or deflect a conversation from the original topic?

The type of logical fallacy that seeks to distract or deflect a conversation from the original topic is known as diversion. This fallacy occurs when the speaker redirects the argument or discussion away from the main issue, often introducing an unrelated topic in order to divert attention or create confusion. By shifting focus, the speaker may attempt to avoid addressing difficult questions or criticisms, thereby undermining the integrity of the discussion.

Understanding diversion is important, as it highlights how conversations can be manipulated. In contrast, inconsequent argumentation deals with irrelevant points but may not specifically aim to distract. An appeal to ignorance refers to asserting that a claim is true because it hasn't been proven false, which doesn't directly relate to distraction. Leading questions, meanwhile, aim to guide respondents to a particular answer, but they don't inherently divert the conversation. Thus, diversion is the most fitting description of a tactic that distracts from the main topic at hand.