Which rhetorical method might a candidate use when addressing their competitors in a debate to sway public opinion?

In a debate context, candidates often seek to persuade the audience by using various rhetorical strategies. One effective method is establishing common ground, which involves finding shared values or beliefs between the candidate and the audience or even their competitors. By highlighting areas of agreement, a candidate can foster a sense of unity and rapport, which makes their arguments more relatable and persuasive.

Citing facts and statistics can also be persuasive, but it primarily aims to bolster the credibility of the candidate's positions rather than directly engaging with opponents. Presenting a false dichotomy involves oversimplifying complex issues, which can mislead audiences rather than genuinely sway them.

Attacking a Straw Man, while it can seem effective, ultimately misrepresents the opposing argument and distracts from meaningful dialogue. Instead, establishing common ground invites the audience to consider the bigger picture and can lead to a more constructive debate, making it a powerful tool for swaying public opinion.