Which of the following best describes a No Technique argument?

A No Technique argument is characterized by a lack of logical structure or coherence, which is precisely what a statement with no logical progression entails. Such arguments fail to establish a clear connection between premises and conclusions, rendering them ineffective in persuading an audience. This approach often results in vague claims or unsupported assertions that do not hold up under scrutiny.

In contrast, questions that lead to assumptions, attacks on an opponent's record, or questions that assume guilt without proof may involve manipulative tactics or appeal to emotions, but they still possess a form of structure or intent, even if their logic is flawed. Therefore, identifying a No Technique argument is about recognizing statements that lack even the semblance of logical flow.