Which logical fallacy does ignoring the evidence in favor of personal attacks illustrate?

Ignoring evidence in favor of personal attacks illustrates the Ad Hominem fallacy, which occurs when an argument is directed against a person rather than addressing the argument they present. This type of fallacy undermines the credibility of the opponent instead of engaging with their ideas or claims. For example, instead of debating the merits of a person's argument, one might attack their character or background. This tactic detracts from the actual issue and focuses the discussion on personal attributes that are irrelevant to the argument at hand. Thus, by resorting to personal attacks, one is effectively sidestepping the responsibility to construct a rational response to the evidence or claims being made, thereby exemplifying the Ad Hominem fallacy.