Which fallacy involves claiming something is true based solely on personal belief?

The choice of Appeal to Ignorance is accurate because this fallacy argues that a claim is true simply because it has not been proven false, or vice versa. It relies on a lack of evidence rather than providing a substantive basis for belief. Essentially, it posits that if something cannot be disproven, it must therefore be accepted as true, which reflects a flawed reasoning process. In discussing personal belief, this fallacy is particularly relevant, as individuals may assert that something is true based upon their own beliefs or assumptions, ignoring the need for solid evidence.

The other options do not fit this definition. An Inconsequent Argument refers to making a conclusion that is not logically connected with the premises, which doesn’t specifically involve personal belief. An Ad Hominem fallacy targets the individual making an argument rather than the argument itself, thus straying away from the issue of personal belief in a claim. A Leading Question is structured to guide respondents towards a particular answer but does not inherently involve a claim being accepted based solely on personal belief.