Which argument type is exemplified by the statement "I don't want him in my class. I had both his brothers in class in the past, and they were rude and obnoxious?"

The statement exemplifies an Inconsequent Argument, which occurs when the conclusion drawn is not logically connected to the premises presented. In this case, the speaker's aversion to having a particular student in class is based solely on their previous experiences with the student's siblings. While past behavior may suggest certain characteristics, it does not provide a valid basis for judging the individual in question. Therefore, the argument does not effectively support the conclusion that the student should not be in the class due to the unrelated actions of their brothers.

This illustrates a flawed reasoning pattern, as it relies on familial association rather than any substantive evidence about the individual in question. The inference made here lacks relevance and fails to address the student's own potential behavior or characteristics. Thus, this type of argument does not hold up under scrutiny since it fails to connect the premises to the conclusion in a meaningful way.