Which argument technique employs an unrelated point to distract from the main issue being discussed?

The argument technique that employs an unrelated point to distract from the main issue being discussed is known as a Red Herring. This rhetorical strategy diverts attention away from the original topic by introducing irrelevant information or claims. By doing so, it can mislead the audience and create confusion about what the main argument or issue is.

For instance, in a debate about climate change, if one participant suddenly starts discussing unrelated issues, such as a political figure's personal life, that shifts the focus and undermines the original argument, exemplifying the use of a Red Herring. This technique is effective in creating doubt or diverting the conversation, effectively steering away from the critical points of contention.

This is distinct from other techniques where the focus may still remain on a related topic but might involve issues such as misleading comparisons or broad generalizations. In contrast, the Red Herring specifically involves introducing information that is not relevant to the matter at hand, thereby serving as a distraction from the central argument.