Which argument suggests that a certain action is justified simply by past patterns, regardless of the current situation?

The argument that suggests a certain action is justified solely based on past patterns without regard for the current situation is known as an inconsequent argument. This form of reasoning fails to establish a logical connection between the evidence presented and the conclusion drawn. Instead, it relies on the historical precedence of an action or outcome to validate its continued relevance or appropriateness, neglecting the nuances or changes that may affect the validity of that action in the present context. This approach can lead to faulty reasoning when circumstances differ significantly from those in the past.