Which argument style might suggest that the principal's decisions are influenced by personal biases?

The argument style that would suggest the principal's decisions are influenced by personal biases is one that attacks the character or circumstances of the principal rather than addressing the actual decisions or policies in question. The Ad Hominem style focuses on discrediting the individual making an argument by pointing out perceived flaws, biases, or motivations in their character. By highlighting these personal attributes, it implies that their decisions cannot be trusted or are unduly influenced by their personal feelings or experiences, rather than relying on rational argument or evidence.

The strength of this argument style lies in its ability to question the validity of the principal’s decisions through the lens of their personal characteristics, suggesting that biases might skew their judgment. This approach shifts the focus from the reasoning behind the principal's decisions to their personal motivations, framing them as potentially unreliable.