Which argument illustrates a claim without necessary context or evidence?

Get more with Examzify Plus

Remove ads, unlock favorites, save progress, and access premium tools across devices.

FavoritesSave progressAd-free
From $9.99Learn more

Prepare for the Academic Games Propaganda Test with flashcards and questions. Review each question with hints and explanations to boost your exam readiness!

The selection of the claim about the Pattersons buying a new car next year exemplifies a statement made without providing the necessary context or evidence to substantiate the assertion. This claim appears to be presented as a straightforward prediction about future behavior; however, it lacks any accompanying information that would explain the basis for the prediction. Context could include details about the Pattersons’ financial situation, their current vehicle, or market conditions that might influence such a decision.

In contrast, the other options involve assumptions or arguments that, while arguably flawed, do present a basis for their claims, whether it be through a personal opinion, an assertion about someone’s character, or a connection to broader influences such as media or public sentiment. These claims may still be contested or lacking in sound reasoning, but they do not fall into the same category as a mere prediction lacking context or evidence.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy