What type of argument can be made when a personal attack is used as a rebuttal to a logical point?

The correct choice refers to an Ad Hominem argument, which specifically involves attacking an individual's character or personal traits instead of addressing the actual argument they are making. This logical fallacy diverts attention from the issue at hand by focusing on the person presenting the argument rather than the argument itself.

For instance, if a person makes a valid point in a debate about climate change, and instead of countering their logic, the opponent remarks on that person's intelligence or credibility, they are employing an Ad Hominem tactic. This approach is problematic because it undermines rational discourse and does not engage with the merits of the argument being presented.

In contrast, other types of arguments like the Straw Man involve misrepresenting someone's argument to attack a weaker version, while Victory by Definition relates to winning an argument solely based on definitions rather than substance. Disproving a Minor Point typically addresses minor issues without engaging with the core argument. Understanding why Ad Hominem is categorized this way helps clarify the importance of logical reasoning and respectful debate tactics.