What technique is illustrated when a discussion diverges to focus on a minor detail instead of the main argument?

Get more with Examzify Plus

Remove ads, unlock favorites, save progress, and access premium tools across devices.

FavoritesSave progressAd-free
From $9.99Learn more

Prepare for the Academic Games Propaganda Test with flashcards and questions. Review each question with hints and explanations to boost your exam readiness!

The technique illustrated when a discussion diverges to focus on a minor detail instead of the main argument is known as "Disproving a Minor Point." This approach often involves shifting the audience's attention away from the central issue by emphasizing a less significant aspect of the argument. By concentrating on these minor points, the argument is sidetracked, and the broader context or more substantial issues at stake can be obscured.

This strategy can detract from constructive dialogue by diverting the focus from more critical arguments and instead engaging with aspects that may be easier to attack or refute. In discussions, it can lead to confusion or a misguided perception of the main argument's validity, as the focus is misappropriated onto points that do not hold significant weight in the overall thesis being presented.

In contrast, other options refer to different logical fallacies or rhetorical tactics that do not specifically pertain to the shifting of focus onto minor details. Leading questions, for instance, attempt to guide the respondent to a certain answer rather than engage with the main argument, while a straw man tactic involves misrepresenting an opponent's argument to make it easier to attack. Ad hominem attacks target the individual rather than addressing the argument itself. Thus, the context of the

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy