What fallacy is illustrated by attacking the credibility of the source rather than addressing the argument itself?

Get more with Examzify Plus

Remove ads, unlock favorites, save progress, and access premium tools across devices.

FavoritesSave progressAd-free
From $9.99Learn more

Prepare for the Academic Games Propaganda Test with flashcards and questions. Review each question with hints and explanations to boost your exam readiness!

The fallacy illustrated by attacking the credibility of the source rather than addressing the argument itself is known as Ad Hominem. This type of argument shifts the focus from the validity of the argument to the characteristics, motives, or actions of the person making the argument. The term "Ad Hominem" literally means "to the person" in Latin, indicating that the attack is directed at the individual instead of the merits of their claims.

This fallacy is significant because it undermines constructive discourse by diverting attention from the topic at hand. Instead of evaluating the logic or evidence supporting an argument, an Ad Hominem attack dismisses or diminishes the argument based only on personal attributes, such as a person's background, character, or affiliations. This tactic can be misleading, as it creates an emotional response rather than a rational critique of the argument itself.

In contrast, other fallacies listed, such as Begging the Question and Straw Man, involve different forms of logical errors. Begging the Question involves circular reasoning where the conclusion is assumed within the premises without proper justification. The Straw Man fallacy misrepresents or oversimplifies an opponent's argument to more easily attack it. A False Dilemma creates an artificial binary situation where only

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy