What fallacy is demonstrated when Professor Quaysar’s proposals are rejected based on a minor point about physics education?

The fallacy illustrated in the scenario is known as "Disproving a Minor Point." This occurs when an argument or proposal is dismissed based on a trivial or insignificant aspect, rather than addressing the main argument or its core ideas. In this instance, Professor Quaysar's proposals are potentially valid and deserve thorough consideration, but the rejection based on a minor point about physics education suggests that the critics may not be engaging with the substance of his work. Instead, they focus on a negligible detail, which diverts attention from the overall merits of his proposals. This practice undermines constructive discourse and can stifle progress if serious ideas are brushed aside merely due to minor flaws or objections.