What does the term 'Inconsequent Argument' mean in logic?

The term 'Inconsequent Argument' in logic refers to an argument that fails to establish a proper logical connection between its premises and conclusion. This means that the conclusions drawn do not logically follow from the arguments presented, leading to a lack of coherence or relevance in the reasoning process. Such arguments may present statements or assertions, but they do not effectively support or justify the conclusion, making them flawed in a logical sense.

In the context of the other options, the definition of an inconsequent argument is distinct from a faulty premise, which specifically indicates issues with the basis of the argument itself. An attack on a person's character pertains to ad hominem fallacies and does not relate to the logical structure of the argument. Finally, a biased question deals with framing that influences answers, rather than the logical connections between premises and conclusions in an argument.