What argument strategy is used when someone emphasizes irrelevant aspects of a discussion to shift focus?

The strategy being described is known as a Red Herring. This tactic involves introducing irrelevant information or points into a conversation or argument to divert attention away from the original topic or issue being discussed. By doing so, the individual effectively sidesteps the main argument and may mislead or confuse their audience, preventing a clear examination of the initial claim or evidence. This redirection can create a false sense of debate without addressing the key point at hand.

In contrast, the other strategies listed serve different purposes; for instance, Tu Quoque focuses on pointing out the hypocrisy of an opponent rather than engaging with their argument. Ad Hominem attacks the character or motives of the individual making a claim rather than addressing the claim itself. The Straw Man tactic involves misrepresenting an opponent's argument to make it easier to refute. Recognizing the Red Herring tactic is crucial for maintaining clarity and focus in discussions.