In what scenario is the logical fallacy of Disproving a Minor Point most clearly illustrated?

The logical fallacy of Disproving a Minor Point is best illustrated by focusing on trivial aspects to dismiss a larger argument. This fallacy occurs when one takes a small, often irrelevant detail of an argument or claim and uses it to invalidate the whole argument, diverting attention from its more significant issues.

In this scenario, the emphasis is on minor details that do not affect the validity or strength of the main argument, effectively undermining the larger discussion without addressing its core components. By concentrating on these trivial matters, the person employing this fallacy is able to divert attention and potentially weaken the credibility of the main point, even though the minor issues do not truly refute the broader argument. This tactic often occurs in debates or discussions where one party feels threatened by the strength of the opposing argument and seeks to undermine it through irrelevant critiques.