In a debate, what does it mean to "disprove a minor point"?

The concept of "disproving a minor point" refers to the ability to challenge or refute a lesser argument or detail that may not be central to the overall position being debated. By doing so, it is often considered a tactic that can cast doubt on the strength or validity of the broader argument that relies on that minor point.

When a debater successfully undermines a minor point, it can create an impression that the opponent's case as a whole is less credible, even if the main argument remains largely unaffected. This approach can be effective in steering the conversation and potentially shifting the focus of the audience's attention from the core issues at hand to smaller, less significant details, thus potentially weakening the opponent's overall position.

The other choices, while related to argumentation strategies, do not accurately capture the essence of disproving a minor point. They address different rhetorical strategies, such as acknowledgment or diversion, but do not encompass the strategic refutation aspect central to this term.