How does the lawyer's questioning suggest guilt during the trial?

The choice suggesting that the lawyer's questioning implies the defendant has stopped a habit can indicate guilt through a few critical means. When a lawyer focuses on a habit that the defendant supposedly quit, it generates suspicion about the defendant's behavior and character. This approach can create a narrative that the defendant's change in behavior is linked to guilt regarding the crime under discussion.

For example, if the lawyer questions the defendant about a past behavior that has since ceased, it may hint at the idea that this change is motivated by guilt or an effort to cover up wrongdoing. Furthermore, implying that the defendant has stopped behavior that was previously consistent suggests an awareness of wrongdoing or a desire to change in response to societal judgment or legal consequences. Such questioning can lead jurors to perceive the defendant as having a consciousness of guilt, thus shaping their overall impression of the defendant's culpability.